Re-did the install by removing all firestream products and rebooted,
installed again, this time only 4.0, did the edit and created 4 tape drives and created new media/saved/rebooted.
Now doing tests with BackupExec which DO seem to work.
I'll be back ..!!.
Thanks,
Search found 4 matches
- 14 Dec 2010, 11:59
- Forum: Firestreamer-RM
- Topic: Evaluating - questions
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14595
- 13 Dec 2010, 19:38
- Forum: Firestreamer-RM
- Topic: Evaluating - questions
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14595
Re: Evaluating - questions
Thanks again,, Well, I'll give Firestreamer 4.0 a shot again...didn't really got it work initially, but that was probably/maybe me, I tried to understand how to load "media" into the slot's ...though I might have given up to soon. Other option off course could be using virtual tape files, though tho...
- 13 Dec 2010, 17:54
- Forum: Firestreamer-RM
- Topic: Evaluating - questions
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14595
Re: Evaluating - questions
Well, I guess I'll have to practice reading again....sorry about that. Yes, it's the Firestreamer RM Im testing. Trying to sort out a "need" we have ...somewhere down a dead-end. Customer have a quite big Netware cluster (but backup beeing done without cluster-support ) So, only option today with a ...
- 13 Dec 2010, 11:15
- Forum: Firestreamer-RM
- Topic: Evaluating - questions
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14595
Evaluating - questions
Been testing Firestreamer as a "work-around" for BackupExec not supplying good performance with backup-2-disc. And initial experience shows big improvement by using Firestreamer instead of BackupExec backing directly to the storage Im using. But, Im wondering if Im having an issue or if it is "by de...